FANDOM


Argument 6Edit

Symbol support voteThey do exist! Companies relocate their production to other countries due to less strict environmental regulations. --Kristinajansen(talk) 11:01, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Jeanette+KristinaEdit

  • Symbol oppose vote According to the Basel Convention it is prohibited to export waste to countries to countries where proper recycling facilities are not available.--Mojojojo89 (talk) 11:11, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote If companies move their production to developing countries, this creates value and jobs in the developing country. This value creation helps develop the countries. There is no exploitation of the less strict regulations. --Katrin und Kerry
    • Symbol support vote People in developing countries normally do not profit from waste imports. The benefits that you describe are primarily for the criminals who actually earn a lot of money from waste trading!!! --193.174.11.19 11:17, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Eva and Til
  • Symbol oppose vote Multinational companies bring more jobs to these countries 193.174.11.19 11:25, January 24, 2014 (UTC) Mohammad
    • Symbol support vote If jobs are created the workers often face a very high health danger because of insufficient security arrangements. Thus, these jobs cannot be considered as "sustainable" --193.174.11.19 11:27, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Anna,Ole
    • Symbol oppose vote Jobs are created in areas where there are no/little alternatives. Without the jobs created by the import of waste, there would not be any wealth creation at all. 193.174.11.19 11:35, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Julia/Alina