Argument 3[]
Developed countries exploit developing countries because these poor countries need money and therefore they accept each type of waste no matter how toxic it is. --193.174.11.19 10:57, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Eva and Till
- We don't agree on this. Developing countries are not obliged to accept the waste, they take it because they want to. It is a mutual benefit. They take it, because they think they can make profit out of it 193.174.11.19 11:08, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Julia and Alina
- The "benefit" has to be considered critically. It is not a whole nation that benefits but single people/companies. The danger of environmental pollution however is carried by the whole population. --193.174.11.19 11:14, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Anna,Ole
- The developing countries are in lack of the knowledge regaring toxic waste. And therefore they don't know how to handle it proporly. For example some use it as furniture. --Kristinajansen (talk) 11:17, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Jeanette+Kristina
- As a consequence, the people in the developing countries will be harmed. Developed countries take advantage of the unknowingness of the people in the developing countries. --193.174.11.19 11:27, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Theresa+Nele
- It can hardly be the responsibility of a corporation/country to advice the citizens of other countries how to handle waste for which a contract has been signed by their governments. The governments have full information as to what they are handling and are therefore responsible to share this with the public/the people likely to get in contact with the waste. --Mojojojo89 (talk) 11:29, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
- The waste is harming the world's entire population and not only people from developing countries. 193.174.11.19 11:32, January 24, 2014 (UTC)Julia